The justification to perform such study because is that no previous studies in Sudan looked into this problem besides that LUTS is increasing. and DRE or other evaluation to rule out prostate cancer. The SCI recommends that physicians consider the following components for a basic diagnostic workup: history physical exam appropriate labs, such as U/A, creatine, etc. The SCI has agreed to use the symptom index for BPH, which has been developed by the AUA Measurement Committee, as the official worldwide symptoms assessment tool for patients suffering from prostatism. Although this single question may or may not capture the global impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) Symptoms or quality of life, it may serve as a valuable starting point for a doctor-patient conversation. The answers to this question range from “delighted” to “terrible” or 0 to 6. Severe (symptom score range 20-35) The International Scientific Committee (SCI), under the patronage of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Union against Cancer (UICC), recommends the use of only a single question to assess the quality of life.Mild (symptom score less than or equal to 7).The first seven questions of the I-PSS are identical to the questions appearing on the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index which currently categorizes symptoms as follows: Nocturia Question eight refers to the patient’s perceived quality of life.The questions refer to the following urinary symptoms: Questions Symptom: The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. Introduction The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Large prostate was noticed to have high PSA level and post void residual urine volume.ġ. A significant correlation was found between IPSS score and PSA, prostate volume, post void residual volume and quality of life. Conclusion: The most common presenting symptoms were weak stream and increased frequency. A good relation was noticed between prostate volume (PV) and PSA level (P value 0.01) and prostate volume and post void residual volume (P value 0.001). Insignificant correlation (P value 0.911) was found between age and IPSS. A significant (P value 0.01) direct proportion was found between IPSS total score and PSA level, prostate volume, post void residual volume and quality of life. The post void residual urine volume mean was 69.3 +/- 39.8ml. The mean Prostate volume was 78.4 +/- 30.7 cc. The IPSS score was mild in (28%), moderate in (22%) and severe in (50%), most of the patients were found to be dissatisfied (27%) or mixed feelings (25%) and only 1% were not bothered with their symptoms. The commonest presenting symptoms were frequency (94%) and weak stream (94%). Results: The total number of patients was 100. All patients were assessed with a well-designed questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS program. Subjects and methods: This is a cross-sectional hospital based study including 100 men who presented with LUTS to three major urological centers in Sudan (Suba, IbnSina and police hospitals), in the period from November 2015 to November 2016. Objectives : To study the prevalence of symptoms of IPSS in three major urological clinics in Khartoum and the correlation of these symptoms with PSA level, post void residual urine volume and prostate volume.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |